------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2005-01-30 18:54 ------- Subject: Re: Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 > 21:19 ------- > As(In reply to comment #7) > >>Or we could simply unroll the loop completely, but while SCEV finds >>the IV as > > > Again this is most likely because fold does not fold "&x.foo[2] - 4B" to > "&x.foo[0]", or someone forgets > to call fold on that. I know that fold_stmt can do it. Yeah, I can find code to fold &x.foo[i] - c * j, but not without the c * mult. I'll look into this later. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19639
