------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
19:54 -------
Confirmed, we should be able to do this on the tree level but don't for
testloop2, testloop3, testloop4.
To answer this question:
* - why is gcc inconsistent in loop reversal bounds????
Because sometimes we do loop reversal on the tree level or the rtl level. See
above about where we
don't do it on the tree level.
Do you know if all of these loops were loop reversal for say 3.4.0?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|target |tree-optimization
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |TREE
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-28 19:54:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19676
