------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28 15:17 ------- > Then I don't understand, why it's exactly them which apply a similar > work-around as RTEMS does: > # grep LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC *.h > linux64.h:#undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC > linux64.h:#define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \ > linux.h:#undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC > linux.h:#define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \ > rtemself.h:#undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC > > I.e. linux* and rtems are having this issue, while others don't seem to have > this issue.
Because the others don't use (a recent) GNU libc according to: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00799.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19663
