must follow a naming format.. all the branches.. it the best practice! 2017-08-24 12:15 GMT-04:00 zxMarce <git...@mg.gitlab.com>:
> Regarding naming the branch, Benoît, I concur. Names must differ. I think > having the ODBC branch apart will be best so I don kill anything by mistake > (same as before with SF). > > What do you think a proper name would be? Something like "ODBC contrib"? I > only have to find where to change my (fork, branch?) name, though... > all the new development and workinig branches must be in naming format.. its the best practice! > Regards, > > *On 24/08/17 13:03, PICCORO Lenz McKAY wrote:* > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab > <https://gitlab.com/gambas/gambas/merge_requests/7#note_38444113>. > You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. If > you'd like to receive fewer emails, you can unsubscribe > <https://gitlab.com/sent_notifications/e652cea759fc10cf2945a7e5e8abda31/unsubscribe> > from this thread or adjust your notification settings. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
