must follow a naming format.. all the branches.. it the best practice!

2017-08-24 12:15 GMT-04:00 zxMarce <git...@mg.gitlab.com>:

> Regarding naming the branch, Benoît, I concur. Names must differ. I think
> having the ODBC branch apart will be best so I don kill anything by mistake
> (same as before with SF).
>
> What do you think a proper name would be? Something like "ODBC contrib"? I
> only have to find where to change my (fork, branch?) name, though...
>
all the new development and workinig branches must be in naming format..
its the best practice!


> Regards,
>
> *On 24/08/17 13:03, PICCORO Lenz McKAY wrote:*
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab
> <https://gitlab.com/gambas/gambas/merge_requests/7#note_38444113>.
> You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com. If
> you'd like to receive fewer emails, you can unsubscribe
> <https://gitlab.com/sent_notifications/e652cea759fc10cf2945a7e5e8abda31/unsubscribe>
> from this thread or adjust your notification settings.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user

Reply via email to