2017-08-16 10:03 GMT-04:00 adamn...@gmail.com <adamn...@gmail.com>: > Rather than have only one single place for the full version history of > the software as is common in once-popular version control systems like CVS or > Subversion (also known as SVN),
YEs that the main problem of the CVS and SVN, the only problem in right! > in Git, every developer's working copy of the code is also a repository that > can contain the full history of all changes. The mayor feature are that every git its a own repo.. \ Decentralized or non-centralized ! that's one of the main features of git! > > Hang on! DVCS? CVS? Oh my blessed little red cotton socks! I remember them. > (The anachronyms, not the socks - must look for them tomorrow.) They were > werry, werry good at hunting wabbits ... back in the day. jajaja > > Bloody hell, the damn thing is just a CVS with big tits and those sparkly > things on it Of course, the large amount of systems for version control always do the same, only added features where the other have failures ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user