2017-08-16 10:03 GMT-04:00 adamn...@gmail.com <adamn...@gmail.com>:
>   Rather than have only one single     place for the full version history of 
> the software as is common in once-popular version control systems like CVS or 
> Subversion (also known as SVN),

YEs that the main problem of the CVS and SVN, the only problem in right!

> in Git, every developer's working copy of the code is also a repository that 
> can contain the full history of all changes.

The mayor feature are that every git its a own repo.. \
Decentralized or non-centralized ! that's one of the main features of git!

>
> Hang on! DVCS? CVS?  Oh my blessed little red cotton socks! I remember them. 
> (The anachronyms, not the socks - must look for them tomorrow.) They were 
> werry, werry good at hunting wabbits  ... back in the day.

jajaja

>
> Bloody hell, the damn thing is just a CVS with big tits and those sparkly 
> things on it

Of course, the large amount of systems for version control always do
the same, only added features where the other have failures

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user

Reply via email to