Le 29/04/2017 à 13:48, Tobias Boege a écrit : > > Yes, admittedly it is strange behaviour of RegExp.Replace() to invert > the greediness of all quantifiers and it was discovered just a few days > ago. I don't know if it is going to be fixed though. I bet there was a > rationale behind this setting, but we'll have to wait for a comment of > Benoit who wrote the code. >
I have no idea about why I forced the PCRE_UNGREEDY flag. :-/ Maybe to match the behaviour of the Gambas Replace() function. The only thing I can do is the following: when specifying explicitly the RegExp.Ungreedy constant in the RegExp.Replace() options, then do the contrary (remove the ungreedy flag). What do you think about that? -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
