the patch that i proposed made the trick! and i found another bug related to older compilers and proposed a patch that i'll send in few minutes
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2016-09-05 10:57 GMT-04:00 Benoît Minisini <gam...@users.sourceforge.net>: > Le 05/09/2016 à 16:53, Benoît Minisini a écrit : > > Le 05/09/2016 à 16:48, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit : > >> still this are open and the patch was given: > >> > >> http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.984&from=L21haW4- > >> > >> and some bugs found related to hmac crypt, seems its better in the near > >> future use polarssl event the openssl that has a long bugs history > >> > >> Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) > >> http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com > >> > > > > Once Tobias has committed the patch, you get it in the next stable > version. > > > > Apparently, openssl is a bad beast and the patch is not so trivial, so > > it takes a little time. > > > > I have read the discussion. If I understood, but Tobias knows better, > gb.openssl needs a function that is officially present in OpenSSL >= > 1.0. But apparently on some Debian systems, OpenSSL has been patched to > have this function in versions lower than 1.0. > > @Tobias: you can replace a test on the openssl version by a test on the > availability of a function in a library. 'autoconf' allows that, it just > a matter of remembering how. :-) > > -- > Benoît Minisini > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-user mailing list > Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
