But is print just take into account the old asci table
2015-12-29 16:35 GMT+01:00 ML <d4t4f...@gmail.com>:
> All,
>
> I might be utterly wrong, but since Linux normally uses UTF-8, any
> high-bit-set char may be interpreted as one of the "multibyte char" flags.
> If isprint() takes this into account, then it's dead right that char by
> itself is not printable!
>
> Hope that helps and makes sense...
>
> On 2015-12-29 11:53, Ru Vuott wrote:
>> Tchao Fabien,
>> Ru .. Characters > to 127 are printable...
>> uhmmm... excuse me, but I do not understand.
>> If I test the "printability" :-) of "characters > to 127" by using C
>> "isprint()" function (that checks whether the passed character is
>> printable), I obtain only zero results.
>> Where: "isprint()" function returns a non-zero value (true) if character is
>> printable, else zero (false) if character is NOT printable.
>>
>> *****************************************************
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> int main() {
>> int i, c;
>> for (i=128; i <= 255; ++i) {
>> c = isprint(i);
>> printf("%d %d\n", i, c);
>> }
>> return (0);
>> }
>> *****************************************************
>> So, it seems resulting that "characters > to 127" are NOT printable
>> characters.
>> Ciao
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
--
Fabien Bodard
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
