Le 09/06/2015 08:25, Rolf-Werner Eilert a écrit : > > Am 09.06.2015 07:24, schrieb Adrien Prokopowicz: >> Le Tue, 09 Jun 2015 04:50:53 +0200, Benoît Minisini >> <gam...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit: >> >>> Le 09/06/2015 04:21, Adrien Prokopowicz a écrit : >>>> Le Sat, 30 May 2015 21:55:04 +0200, Benoît Minisini >>>> <gam...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit: >>>> >>>>> Le 30/05/2015 21:42, Adrien Prokopowicz a écrit : >>>>>> Le Sat, 30 May 2015 20:23:17 +0200, Benoît Minisini >>>>>> <gam...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm currently testing the SVN import feature of github for Gambas. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The plan is to migrate from subversion to something else, that "else" >>>>>>> having to provide git (or svn) and a bug tracker. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The main reason is the "Gimp" sourceforge case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If anyone has a problem against using git instead of subversion, >>>>>>> please >>>>>>> tell. I don't know how to use git yes, and I think it will be better >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> faster. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know if I can import Google issues into github with the >>>>>>> Google >>>>>>> code export, I will check. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And at the moment, GitHub tells me that 87% of the repository is >>>>>>> imported, while sending me a mail telling that the import has failed >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> the same time... Weird! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>> I have used Github (and therefore Git) for both school and personal >>>>>> projects for quite some time, so personally I have no problem with >>>>>> Gambas >>>>>> switching to it. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, Github does not provide website hosting nor mailing-list >>>>>> features, >>>>>> so will these stay on SourceForge ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, I haven't found any "Gambas" organization, do you plan to make >>>>>> one >>>>>> before importing the repository ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>> I just created a personal account to check svn import. >>>>> >>>> Have you had any success importing the svn repository to Github ? >>>> >>> Yes, but there is no mailing-list. I'm thinking about "gna!" now... >>> >> Oh right, I forgot about that ... >> >> I made some research around gna!, and I have a few questions : >> >> - gna! seems to have originated from GNU Savannah, but I couldn't >> find the exact reasons of this separation, and both look pretty >> similar to me. So why not going to Savannah (which seems bigger >> and directly supported by the FSF and GNU) ? >> >> - Also, thinking about gna!/savannah reminded me of this old >> proposition[0] to become a GNU project. >> I don't remember you actually accepting or rejecting it, nor >> being rejected by the GNU project, so what happened ? >> Maybe they could help with this hosting problem ... >> >> [0] https://sourceforge.net/p/gambas/mailman/message/32334826/ > > As far as I remember, GNU's restrictions for the source code and rules > for comments within the sources were too strict or badly adaptable to > the Gambas way of doing. In the end, the idea seemed to fail at this > point, as nobody was able or willing to rewrite the code to fulfill the > requirements. > > But I haven't read the archives yet, so it's purely taken from my memory > which has a high error rate ;) > > Regards > Rolf >
No, it's "just" a matter of having the time of filling that: http://www.gnu.org/help/evaluation.html I didn't have the time since last year to deal with that... As for gna!, according to Wikipedia, it is a fork of Savannah made by the creators of Savannah that wanted to keep their way of managing it by collaboration. Regards, -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
