Le 23/12/2012 23:08, Tobias Boege a écrit : > Hi Benoit, > > we have gb.task on our schedule now and I found two examples on the mailing > list: > > - Olivier Cruilles: [0] > - Ivan Kern: [1] > > Well, the first one seems to be designed to do nothing (no Task-inheriting > object is instantiated at all - I don't know if it did work the time it was > written, though) but if one modifies it to create a Task, it is almost > instantly killed; just as if the Main() was executed and no event loop kicks > in, even if a Timer was created which, according to [2], compels the event > loop. > > The second example, mainly listed for completeness, shows a workaround but > not a really satisfying one if one would like to do something else than > waiting. > > So, is (or "shall be") gb.task allow operation with the event loop? What's > wrong with the first example (the modified one)? > > Regards, > Tobi > > [0] http://gambas.8142.n7.nabble.com/attachment/24430/0/gbTask-0.0.1.tar.gz > [1] http://gambas.8142.n7.nabble.com/attachment/17637/0/TaskTest.zip > > [2] http://gambasdoc.org/help/cat/eventloop?v3 >
Task are actually sub-processes run through the fork() system call. So they can only communicate the main process with the standard input/output streams. The event loop is only run in the main process. -- Benoît Minisini ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
