On Sat, 05 May 2012, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 05/05/2012 03:42, Bruce Bruen a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 02:45 +0200, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> >> Le 04/05/2012 23:34, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> I don't like any of those solution at the moment.
> >>>
> >>> And if I define a compilation constant that will tell the compiler if we
> >>> are making an executable or not? That way, you will just have to add a
> >>> "#If Executable" (or something like that) to compile or not compile the
> >>> startup function ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is the solution I implemented in revision #4715. Tell me if it fits
> >> your needs.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> > Benoît,
> >
> > I'm trying it but I need a bit of help on usage. (I'm using a library
> > that has a startup form not a module. Is this a bad idea?)
> >
> > Public Sub Form_Open()
> >
> > #If Executable
> > Me.Center
> > LoadInfos
> > #Else
> > Error "This is a library.\nPlease do not run it directly"
> > Message.Title = "Don't do that!"
> > Message.Error("This is a library.\nPlease do not run it directly",
> > "OK")
> > Quit
> > #Endif
> >
> > End
> >
> > If I compile the project and run it via gbx3, I get the expected "Don't
> > do that" messages, but if I run it in the IDE I get the same thing.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
>
> The constant is "Exec". I try to use Gambas keywords, because it is
> easier for the preprocessor (that is not entirely finished).
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Benoît Minisini
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Gambas-user mailing list
> Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Concerning the preprocessor... What about utilising the cpp just as a command
that runs over each
class and module file before seen by the compiler code? It's already powerful
enough or is that
too much for gambas? (It would break existing code due to character case in the
gambas preprocessor
directives...)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
