Yes, but it have to use different hash function, which is probably slower (it creates longer hash codes).
Jussi On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 21:51, John Spikowski <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:47 +0300, Jussi Lahtinen wrote: > > Collections are probably much slower with ScriptBasic. > > > > Jussi > > I doubt it. The hash extension module is written in C as a shared > object. (.so) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Gambas-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
