----- Original Message ----- 
From: Robert Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 4:39 PM
Subject: [corp-focus] The Billionaire Mindset and Wealth Inequality


> The Billionaire Mindset and Wealth Inequality
> By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
> 
> Surely one of the most amusing developments of the 2000 presidential
> election campaign is the emergence of Billionaires for Bush (or Gore). 
> 
> With chants and slogans like "Vote for Bush (or Gore)  Because Inequality
> is Not Growing Fast Enough" and "Who needs day care, hire an au pair!" the
> Billionaires have highlighted not only the big money corruption of
> politics, but problems of growing income and wealth inequality in the
> United States.
> 
> (For more on the Billionaires for Bush (or Gore), a project of the
> Boston-based activist group United for a Fair Economy, see
> www.billionairesforbushorgore.com)
> 
> Far less entertaining, but somewhat more surprising is a recent report
> from the Conference Board that also highlights how the current economic
> boom times have left low-wage workers behind.
> 
> The Conference Board's answers the question in its report title, "Does a
> Rising Tide Lift All Boats?" with a telling subtitle: "America's Full-Time
> Working Poor Reap Limited Gains in the New Economy."
> 
> The report is important for two reasons.
> 
> First, it shows that distribution of the gains from the information
> economy have been extremely skewed, with benefits heavily concentrated
> among the wealthy and not shared among the bottom of the income and
> distribution curve.
> 
> "Poverty has risen in both the number and share of those employed
> full-time and year-round since 1973," the report finds. While the number
> of full-time workers making poverty wages declined dramatically in the
> 1960s and early 1970s (from just under 5 percent in 1966 to 2 percent in
> 1973), there have been no gains since then. In fact, the proportion of
> full-time workers making poverty wages rose to 2.9 percent in 1998, the
> most recent year for which such data is available.
> 
> The number of full-time workers earning poverty wages does not indicate
> the number of people in poverty, because it does not register the poverty
> rate among those without full-time work, nor does it take into account the
> effects of taxes, tax credits (including the important Earned Income Tax
> Credit) or government assistance for poor people. 
> 
> But by focusing on wages rather than ancillary government support and
> taxation programs, the Conference Board offers a unique insight into the
> failure of the current wage distribution to enable families to escape from
> poverty. (The numbers would appear far worse had the analysis focused on a
> living wage level, which is significantly above the artificially low
> poverty level.)
> 
> The second reason the Conference Board report is important is because of
> what the Conference Board is.
> 
> The New York-based organization is a business-backed research enterprise
> best known for its monthly Leading Economic Indicators and Consumer
> Confidence Index. It is viewed as a dispassionate research agency, not a
> front group for the corporations that fund it. 
> 
> Its trustees and officers represent a segment of the enlightened corporate
> class, those who are aiming to protect corporations' long-term interests.
> Among those corporations represented: Bestfoods, Phillips Petroleum, J.C.
> Penney, Excel, Texaco, Martha Stewart Living, Fidelity Management and
> Research, Goldman Sachs, British Airways, Unisys -- and yes, we know many
> of these may not seem "enlightened." But the point is that in their
> concern to head off social unrest before it develops, they may be willing
> to make significant concessions in an attempt to quiet social movements.
> 
> In a description of its historical origins, the Conference Board says it
> "was born out of a crisis of industry in 1916" when "declining public
> confidence in business and rising labor unrest had become severe threats
> to economic growth and stability." 
> 
> The decision to focus a report on the failure of the new economy to
> provide above-poverty wages to millions of full-time workers suggests that
> there may be, perhaps, an emerging concern with income and wealth
> inequality among foresighted business leaders.
> 
> "For too long, we've only counted our money, but today we stand up and
> count ourselves. Billionaires, stand up and be counted!" proclaimed Phil
> T. Rich at the Million Billionaires March outside the Republican
> convention in Philadelphia on July 30.
> 
> The Conference Board may not be ready to join such mocking efforts, but
> these and other stirrings of discontent do seem to be worrying the
> Conference Board's corporate members. 
> 
> Are the Conference Board members ready to support unionization and living
> wage regulations, among the obvious solutions to the problems highlighted
> in the organization's recent report? 
> 
> Without a bit more of the "unrest" which led to the Conference Board's
> founding, probably not. But the publication of the report, the emergence
> of the Billionaires for Bush (or Gore) and aggressive union organizing of
> low-wage workers by some U.S. unions may in different ways signal that
> such unrest is now, slowly but finally, growing.
> 
> 
> Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
> Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
> Multinational Monitor. They are co-authors of Corporate Predators: The
> Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common
> Courage Press, 1999).
> 
> (c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
> and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or 
> repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on 
> a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us 
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> 
> Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail 
> message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text: subscribe
> 
> Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
> <http://www.corporatepredators.org>.
> 
> Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to 
> comment on the columns, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to