Dear WesBurt,
I'd appreciate it if you would not put words into my mouth that I have
neither written nor uttered. Any interpretation that *you* may have of
my words should be so labeled, along with my original words.
My last two posts have elicited no rebuffs and no support. Garrett
Hardin's newest book, _The Ostrich Factor_, Our Population Myopia seems
to describe the majority on this list to a 'T'. He assails traditional
economists and pleas for a merger of that field of study/practice with
ecologists.
Your codified dogma is not a meaningful part of the 'resolutique' in my
opinion.
you wrote:
> Two years ago, the micro-model Figure 7-9 of the ten figure global model was
> Steve Kurtz's favorite illustration of the simple solution. He suggested
> that the two missing moral Commandments would make better sense if modified
> to read as follows:
>
> #5, To each according to his needs, while in development.
>
> #6, From each according to his ability, while in production.
> (but not much more than 30% of what his ability produces)
>
> Figure 7 shows that the human life cycle (development precedes production)
> makes the two missing Commandments necessary to enforce a full implementation
> of the first tithe, from production to development.
>
>
snip
Steve Kurtz
