|
In a posting yesterday, I made the point that in Canada "we've tried
to deal with it via an Aboriginal claims process which is intended to define and
make explicit the Aboriginal rights entrenched in our Constitution as these
apply to particular groups. This is not a fully satisfactory process since
it applies mainly to Aboriginal people who did not come under treaty during the
Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries and whose rights have not therefore
been defined. These people are considered to have 'outstanding
claims'." This is known as the "comprehensive claims
process".
I should have mentioned that there is a parallel process for Indian people
who have treaties but can make the case that certain provisions of their
treaties have not been honored or have been violated. This is the
"specific claims process", One specific claims case with which I
have some familiarity deals with lands in Saskatchewan. The Indian Bands
of Saskatchewan signed treaties in the 1870s well before Saskatchewan became a
province in 1905. Lands and resources were not transferred from the
federal government to the Government of Saskatchewan until the 1930s. They
were transferred on condition that the Province fulfill all outstanding
land-related treaty obligations. The Province did not do so. The
result is a recent, and I would surmise, still continuing step-by-step,
band-by-band, process of determining how much additional land the Indian people
are entitled to and how much monetary compensation this might require in lieu of
land.
Ed Weick
|
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ed Weick
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ray E. Harrell
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ed Weick
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ray E. Harrell
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ray E. Harrell
- Y2K Ray E. Harrell
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ray E. Harrell
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Ed Weick
- Re: Canadian Indian Claims Robert Rosenstein
