Subject: The Global Model, III

Bill Ellis on list Attac, and other respondants,

I thank each of you for your kind words of support in reply to several of my 
previous posts, but I am always left with the feeling that you have only 
identified a kindred reformer's spirit, without hearing or understanding 
anything that kindred reformer said.  You are in good company in this regard. 
 I can count on the fingers of only one hand the number of respondants, since 
I started these letters in 1969, who have written to say they agreed with, a 
sentence I had written, a bit of data I had mentioned, or a corrective action 
I had proposed to moderate our growing social chaos.

You wrote, with great certainty: 

"Knowledge is creating the shift from The Dominator Paradigm (as Eisler calls 
it) to the Gaian Paradigm (as Capra calls it).  This deep fundamental 
cultural transformation is well exemplified by your good works.
>>>>>>>>>>> snip <<<<<<<<<<<<
Your analysis tells it well.  But, there is a crucial missing element of the 
alternative and transformational movement(s) that you too
miss.  That is the fact that as long as future citizens are put in
authoritarian, patriarchal, hierarchical schools to learn how to
compete, and rise above one another, and to dominate nature, 
we can expect that kind of a society to continue to exist.
>>>>>>>>>>> snip <<<<<<<<<<<<
We'd welcome any comments on the place and
mode of learning in the world you envision."
>>>>>>>>>> End Bill Ellis wrote <<<<<<

In the world I envision, folks like Riane Eisler, Capra, Linda Grover, 
yourself, and 
other serious reformers will find it easy to effect technically valid
reforms in their area of specialization and expertise, in marked contrast to 
their
present condition.  This improvement (in the promotion of learning, in your 
case) will be brought about, if I live long enough, because I have addressed 
the root cause of our social chaos, and will have informed a public opinion 
capable of eliminating the primary obstacle to the democratic process of 
correcting technical defects in our public policy by open debate.  

The thing I see as the primary obstacle to open debate (for all people in 
every society) is naturally present in two places in every society, once 
between corporations and their world market (0 to 90 degrees on Figures 4, 5, 
& 6), and again, between households and the labor market (180 to 270 degrees 
on Figure 4, 5, & 6 of the global model at URL: 
<http://www.freespeech.org/darves/bert.html>).

The thing (in both places) corrupts the natural operation of free markets, 
and has several adverse consequences for the society as a whole:

1, it prices many smaller contributers out of either market.

2, it depresses the effective demand of the whole workforce.  This deficiency 
of local purchasing power causes the drive of corporations for foreign 
markets and the drive of national governments for global hegemony.

3, it makes competition among suppliers (corporations or workers) much too 
intense, by making production at any level whatever always in excess of 
current effective demand (real purchasing power).  It does this by depressing 
effective demand, not by more efficient production.

4, It changes the slope of each individual corporation's or worker's "supply 
curve" from a positive slope (as shown in every economics textbook I have 
ever read) to a negative slope (as in "increasing returns to scale").  The 
technical effects of this slope change was discussed by my favorite 
economist, Henry Carter Adams, in his1887 monograph, RELATION OF THE STATE TO 
INDUSTRIAL ACTION, by contempory staff members of the Federal Reserve System, 
and is always of interest to students of servo-mechanism theory.

With those four aspects of the thing, as they affect the workforce and their 
dependants, stacked in favor of the DDotSQ since the 1890s, it is a tribute 
to our serious reformers that any progressive legislation has emerged in the 
U.S.A. in the 20th century from our democratic process .  The 1942 G.I. Bill 
is the only
example of such progressive legislation that I can call to mind, and even 
that was promptly turned into loan programs from Congressionally sponsored 
(and owned?) corporations at prime (+) interest rates as soon as the last WW 
II veteran graduated from college.

But this thing is only half a problem for the capital plant (0 to 90 degrees 
on Figures 4, 5, & 6 of the global model), because the GAAP (Generally 
Accepted Accounting Practices) teach businessmen not to include fixed costs 
in the variable cost data used to schedule production and set prices.  But 
the continued existance of the thing at the labor market (180 to 270 degrees 
on Figure 4, 5, & 6 of the global model) adversely affects both rich and 
poor, corporate CEO and worker, because it depresses the Gross National 
Product (GNP flow of M1) which is common to both the capital sector and human 
sector of every society.  To see how and why, look at <FIG8.GIF> (a 
cross-section of the GNP) on the global model and see the defect in our 
public policy which tries to make one dollar do the work of two or more 
dollars.

Bill Ellis, let me be perfectly clear about my complaint.  Those serious 
reformers who focus on education, on local employment-trading systems (LETS), 
on Global Resource Banks, or on the benefits of eating algae; and totally 
exclude this "Teflon Topic" from their deliberations, are addressing only a 
lessor part of the social problem, that is, they are playing with a "short 
deck."  This thing, this systemic defect of omission in our public policy, is 
the one thing that reaches every human being and affects their lives for 
better or worse.  More than any contemporary religion or ideology, it is the 
common cause of mankind.  And its proper application, or neglect, may be 
traced throughout our recorded history, even after that history has been 
fiddled with by Greeks, Romans, or members of Oxford for 2500 years. 

Kind regards to all,

WesBurt
   

Reply via email to