1. How do you define compatibility?
especially in a mathematical language for
the computer.
Making similar decisions, as you say
yourself, is not necessarily a solution.
Define this in computer language:
How often are couples able to resolve
disagreements in a satisfactory manner for
both of them? How would you know this before
they meet?
I think the same applies for friend-relationships.
Would people be happy to leave their local
pond for the possibility of "better" friendship/
spouse?
It seems that in the past in small communities people
found both friend and spouse - though probably
the expectations were miles different. people
became isolated/enstranged in the large masses
of the cities, but I think more to do with
the working/living practices, than the numbers.
2. If you picture a no-profit, thus non-capitalist
society, as you mention at some point, there is
no employer-employee, but co-worker relationships.
3. You still have to have a high level economical
integration for a high-technology society you
envisage - and indeed we need, to keep 6-->10
billion people going. You have to decide on
a more universal democratic structure to make
the larger community to be able to cooperate
effectively.
Eva
