As it's world prank day I had to check wikipedia and snopes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox_Communications,_Inc._v._Sony_Music_Entertainment
Ok who ever had: parasitic internet cobal being going chaotic good anti-hero on there Bingo card. Pls go invest a ton into the stock market. I just have a 2% finders fee. I didn't have: week of april 1 be when this timeline would be sane for just a few days. On my bingo card. Forwarding it along because it's news with a silver linning. that is ridiculous it even went to trial, and wasn't rejected back in 2019. on the other hand... Based on the latest developments, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox Communications on March 25, 2026, reversing a lower court decision that had held the internet service provider (ISP) liable for $1 billion in damages regarding copyright infringement by its users. [1 <https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/cox-communications-inc-v-sony-music-entertainment/#:~:text=Judgment:%20Reversed%20and%20remanded%2C%209%2D0%2C%20in%20an,an%20opinion%20concurring%20in%20the%20judgment%2C%20joined>, 2 <https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5799938-supreme-court-rules-cox-communications/#:~:text=The%20lawsuit%20is%20aimed%20at%2057%2C000%20Cox,found%20to%20infringe%20over%2010%2C000%20copyrighted%20works.>, 3 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox_Communications,_Inc._v._Sony_Music_Entertainment#:~:text=The%20Court%20issued%20its%20decision%20on%20March,Fourth%20Circuit's%20decision%20and%20remanding%20the%20case.>, 4 <https://www.mintz.com/insights-center/viewpoints/2251/2026-03-27-supreme-court-narrows-contributory-copyright-liability#:~:text=On%20March%2025%2C%202026%2C%20the%20U.S.%20Supreme,the%20scope%20of%20contributory%20copyright%20infringement%20liability.>, 5 <https://www.law360.com/articles/2357722/copyright-and-tm-cases-to-watch-in-the-second-half-of-2025#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20picked%20up%20a,liable%20for%20the%20infringing%20activities%20of%20users.> ] Here is the breakdown of the Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment case: Key Case Details - The Dispute: Sony Music Entertainment, along with other labels, sued Cox in 2018, alleging that Cox did not adequately cut off internet access for customers who were repeat infringers downloading copyrighted music. - Original Verdict (2019/2024): A jury originally found Cox liable for willful contributory and vicarious infringement, awarding $1 billion in damages. In February 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the vicarious liability finding but upheld the contributory infringement ruling, stating Cox knew of the piracy and didn't stop it. - Supreme Court Ruling (March 25, 2026): The Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision, reversed the Fourth Circuit's decision, finding that Cox was not liable for contributory infringement. - Impact: This ruling significantly limits the liability of ISPs for the infringing activities of their users, protecting them from being held responsible for piracy committed by subscribers simply because the ISP provided the connection. [1 <https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf#:~:text=The%20jury%20found%20in%20favor%20of%20Sony,awarded%20$1%20billion%20in%20stat%2D%20utory%20damages.>, 2 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox_Communications,_Inc._v._Sony_Music_Entertainment#:~:text=Cox%20Communications%20was%20sued%20by%20multiple%20music,the%20labels'%20copyrighted%20music%2C%20arguing%20Cox%20financially>, 3 <https://www.debevoise.com/insights/publications/2025/12/supreme-court-faced-with-two-extremes-in-cox-comm#:~:text=2018).,materially%20contributing%E2%80%9D%20to%20copyright%20infringement?>, 4 <https://www.wiley.law/alert-Supreme-Court-Takes-Up-Cox-Communications-Copyright-Infringement-Case#:~:text=The%20court%20affirmed%20the%20district,a%20new%20trial%20on%20damages.&text=On%20August%2015%2C%202024%2C%20Cox,%C2%A7%20504(c)?%E2%80%9D>, 5 <https://newsroom.cox.com/2025-06-30-U-S-Supreme-Court-Agrees-to-Hear-Significant-Copyright-Case#:~:text=In%20February%202024%2C%20the%20Fourth,future%20for%20the%20next%20generation.>, 6 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox_Communications#:~:text=Cox%20Communications%2C%20Inc.,and%20home%20automation%20services%20company.>, 7 <https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5799938-supreme-court-rules-cox-communications/#:~:text=The%20lawsuit%20is%20aimed%20at%2057%2C000%20Cox,found%20to%20infringe%20over%2010%2C000%20copyrighted%20works.> ] Summary Table Aspect [1 <https://www.oyez.org/cases/2025/24-171>, 2 <https://business.cch.com/ipld/SP_2025-Supreme-Court-preview_09-29-2025_final.pdf>, 3 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDw5mbagfBc&t=127>, 4 <https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/cox-communications-inc-v-sony-music-entertainment/#:~:text=Judgment:%20Reversed%20and%20remanded%2C%209%2D0%2C%20in%20an,an%20opinion%20concurring%20in%20the%20judgment%2C%20joined>, 5 <https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5799938-supreme-court-rules-cox-communications/#:~:text=The%20lawsuit%20is%20aimed%20at%2057%2C000%20Cox,found%20to%20infringe%20over%2010%2C000%20copyrighted%20works.> ] Details Case Name Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment Plaintiffs Sony Music Entertainment (and other music labels) Defendant Cox Communications Core Issue ISP liability for subscriber copyright piracy (Contributory Infringement) Outcome (March 2026) Supreme Court ruled 9-0 for Cox Result Reverses $1 billion damage award; limits ISP liability The decision is viewed as a major victory for internet service providers in maintaining "safe harbor" protections against user-generated copyright infringement. [1 <https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/2026/03/25/supreme-court-cox-pirated-music/89314792007/#:~:text=Cox%20spokesperson%20Todd%20Smith%20called%20the%20decision,liable%20for%20the%20actions%20of%20their%20customers.%22>, 2 <https://nationaltoday.com/us/dc/washington/news/2026/03/29/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-cox-in-music-piracy-case/#:~:text=Why%20it%20matters%20The%20ruling%20is%20a,lead%20to%20widespread%20disruptions%20in%20internet%20access.>, 3 <https://www.wiley.law/alert-Supreme-Court-Takes-Up-Cox-Communications-Copyright-Infringement-Case#:~:text=The%20court%20affirmed%20the%20district,a%20new%20trial%20on%20damages.&text=On%20August%2015%2C%202024%2C%20Cox,%C2%A7%20504(c)?%E2%80%9D> ] - <https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5799938-supreme-court-rules-cox-communications/#:~:text=The%20lawsuit%20is%20aimed%20at%2057%2C000%20Cox,found%20to%20infringe%20over%2010%2C000%20copyrighted%20works.> Supreme Court rules for Cox in copyright fight with Sony Mar 25, 2026 — The lawsuit is aimed at 57,000 Cox customer accounts that Sony says weren't cut off and were found to infringe over 10,000 copyrig... [image: image.png] The Hill [image: image.jpeg] - <https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/cox-communications-inc-v-sony-music-entertainment/#:~:text=Judgment:%20Reversed%20and%20remanded%2C%209%2D0%2C%20in%20an,an%20opinion%20concurring%20in%20the%20judgment%2C%20joined> Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment Mar 26, 2026 — Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on March 25, 2026. Justice Sotomayor wrote an opinion concur... [image: image.png] SCOTUSblog [image: image.jpeg] - <https://www.wiley.law/alert-Supreme-Court-Takes-Up-Cox-Communications-Copyright-Infringement-Case#:~:text=The%20court%20affirmed%20the%20district,a%20new%20trial%20on%20damages.&text=On%20August%2015%2C%202024%2C%20Cox,%C2%A7%20504(c)?%E2%80%9D> Supreme Court Takes Up Cox Communications Copyright ... Jul 8, 2025 — The court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment against Cox for contributory copyright infringement on procedura... [image: image.png] Wiley Rein [image: image.jpeg] Show all Dive deeper in AI Mode AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses Web results 24-171 Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music ... [image: image.png] Supreme Court of the United States (.gov) https://www.supremecourt.gov › opinions <https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf> 8 days ago — The jury found in favor of *Sony* on both theo- ries, found *Cox's* infringement willful, *and* awarded $1 billion in stat- utory damages. The ...Read more <https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf#:~:text=The%20jury%20found%20in%20favor,denied%20Cox's%20post%2Dtrial%20motion%20for> 27 pages Missing: son | Show results with: son <https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=b78cf8500232fcdc&sxsrf=ANbL-n5XBBGJFi2oRRwn0soK_-53omp1gQ:1775086194083&q=%22son%22+vs+cox&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih6qyw582TAxUGODQIHZMmNo0Q5t4CegQILxAB>
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-.. FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
