For testing SVG, Skia has an OT-SVG testing font. [0] This font is more or
less a reconstruction from the examples in the Open type specification.
However, it also does interesting things with the em and view box to ensure
those are handled correctly.

[0]
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/69f7860093b4ec7971d1e3bee458847aa849c351/resources/fonts/SampleSVG.ttf

On Tue, May 23, 2023, 4:39 PM Hin-Tak Leung <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I don't know why glyf and svg differs from about gid 119 onwards, but I
> intend to add the color toggle flag to ftgrid to find out.... surprised it
> is not in ftgrid yet!
>
> On Wednesday, 24 May 2023 at 00:22:17 GMT+8, Hin-Tak Leung <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> To not break the other SVG color fonts I have, this refinement (the
> viewbox part) seems to work better:
>
> + if ((out_has_viewbox != TRUE) &&
> + (((int)out_width.length == 1) && ((int)out_height.length == 1))) {
> + x_svg_to_out /= units_per_EM;
> + y_svg_to_out /= units_per_EM;
> + }
> +
>
> Beside this sets of arabic fonts, I only have two other svg color fonts -
> EmojiOne Color bundled with photoshop, and a work-in-progress svg font
> shared privately from Adobe folks at the beginning of my adding basic SVG
> support to FontVal. So both of those could be considered made with
> Adobe-related tech. Both of those have viewbox TRUE.
>
> come to think of it, this font's sampler on google fonts looks a bit odd -
> I think the horizontal metrices might be a bit buggy. (or freetype not
> quite happy with laying them out horizontally). regarding toggling between
> svg and glyf at for gids 300-470 at 72 ppem
> On Tuesday, 23 May 2023, 16:57:52 BST, Hin-Tak Leung <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> After hacking scale factor of 1000 out, the first few pages of glpyhs are
> identical, but toggling glyphs in the higher up (gid 300-470) at 72em, they
> don't quite line up - horizontally moved. It seems to have color glyphs to
> about 470, after that 470 to 1138 are just b/w.
>
> On Tuesday, 23 May 2023 at 23:40:29 GMT+8, Hin-Tak Leung <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, 23 May 2023, 05:25:27 BST, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Please give more details, using valgrind options `--leak-check=full`
> > and `--show-leak-kinds=all` together with setting environment variable
> > `FT2_DEBUG=any:7`.
>
> Actually FT2_DEBUG=any:7 was enough to see what the problem is. The svg
> code path is trying to do bitmaps
> 1000x1000 bigger than the glyf code path (compare the same glyph - I only
> get only about 7 glyphs for 400 ppem).
>
> If I insert into src/rsvg-port.c , around line 255, something like the
> below, I can toggle between b/w and more or less correctly:
>
> =======================
> /* Scale factors from SVG coordinates to the needed output size. */
> x_svg_to_out = (double)metrics.x_ppem / dimension_svg.width;
> y_svg_to_out = (double)metrics.y_ppem / dimension_svg.height;
>
> + if (((int)out_width.length == 1) && ((int)out_height.length == 1)) {
> + x_svg_to_out /= units_per_EM;
> + y_svg_to_out /= units_per_EM;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Create a cairo recording surface. This is done for two reasons.
> * Firstly, it is required to get the bounding box of the final drawing
> ========================
>
> I think I remember seeing somewhere that a width and height =1 is special,
> in the opentype spec? what width and height do you get in this location?
>
> Hin-Tak
>
>

Reply via email to