Suzuki, > Currently, my patch cares only FT_Face->num_glyphs > for the face loaded by the t1cid driver. Do you > concern as "the num_glyphs is no more than the > declaration, there is no guarantee that the user > can get a glyph image of the CID within the range > 0...FT_Face->num_glyph, FT_Load_Glyph() test is reliable?
In my opinion, only validated CIDs are interesting. Therefore, FT_Get_CID_From_Glyph_Index is confusing to me. It looks like it is useful for CFF only but not for Type 1. It looks like the we need different approaches: FT_Load for t1cid and FT_Get_CID for CFF. Do you know where I can find some CFF CID-fonts? Alexei
