> Can I suggest a more intuitive scheme?
> A,a to control axis 1
> B,b to control axis 2
> C,c to control axis 3
> and so on.
>
> This is also easier to process. Or this
> 1,! to control axis 1
> 2,@ to control axis 2
> but this is only for US keyboard
OK, will go for the first scheme. Honestly, whatever we choose, it is
bad. I first thought about also using Shift-F1, Shift-F2, etc., but
this is non-trivial to implement, alas.
Another idea was
F1, 1 axis 1
F2, 2 axis 2
...
F10, 0 axis 10
A, a axis 11
...
F, f axis 16
since it resembles hexadecimal notation and avoids any US-specific
keyboard assignments. However, we would need to find new keys for
adjusting the glyph index, and these key assignments would be
different to other demo programs. Sigh.
Werner
