Hello Alexei,
> You used to release a new version around this time of year. What are
> your plans this time around? Are you waiting for some official
> specs for COLRv1?
Not really for the official specs, but for green light that the COLRv1
stuff is OK to be published as experimental but stable.
Dominik?
> I am happy with the round of QALLOC/QNEW clean-ups, which did not
> produce many fuzzing problems. And the rendering optimizations add
> up to 20%.
Thanks a lot for that!
> I am a bit concerned with 16-bit SDF. It comes in *whatever*
> platform endianness. It is probably an overkill and 8-bits would
> work just fine because the distance does not have to be expressed in
> "pixels". For example, it can be scaled to signed [-128,127] with 0
> threshold, or unsigned [0,255] with an arbitrary threshold. We did
> not have a good discussion on this.
I have no opinion on that. If you think this should be further
discussed I suggest that you do it now :-) On the other hand, I
think there *was* some discussion regarding 8bit vs 16bit. Have you
looked up the freetype-devel mailing list archive? I seem to remember
that there were good reasons for 16bit.
Werner