> These are some horrible numbers that essentially test FT_Load_Glyph > from compressed unifont.pcf.gz in reverse order: [...] > > real 0m6.062s > > The same string forward is much faster: [...] > > real 0m0.486s
Ouch.
> Is it well known that rewinding the compressed stream is so
> prohibitively expensive? Or, is this a bug?
I don't know, sorry. The basic question is, I guess, whether we are
correctly using the gzip interface ...
Werner
