Hi Nikolaus > Random thought: Test with Cascadia Code > (https://github.com/microsoft/cascadia-code/releases/tag/v2007.01). The > (variable) font is very Lego-like in its construction.
You have seen a lot of these fonts. How often the variation fonts set OVERLAP_SIMPLE or OVERLAP_COMPOSITE even though it is not required? I wonder if those flags are sufficiently respected to trigger FT_OUTLINE_OVERLAP. What would be equivalent on the CFF2 side? Thanks, Alexei
