> *I agree with Behdad. Using functions, even for stuff that gets called* > *only once, greatly enhances readability of code, among other things.* > *So please proceed as you plan :-)*
Yes, I will. Thanks >> *I strongly advise that you reconsider this.* > > *We discussed that already, didn't we?* Yes, I will summarize. For now I will be using fixed points. And later I will write code specific to platforms which support floats and SIMD. I hope that is okay. > *I beg to differ. A GSoC project is not only to implement one thing in* > *one way. It is an opportunity to learn. Anuj is now seeing both* > *sides of the fixed-point mathematics medal, so to say; as soon as he* > *will have mastered the project he knows *exactly* when to use it and* > *when to avoid. * Before this project I never knew there was something like fixed-point. I knew that at the end of the day floats are also stored in bit array, but I didn't know that something like this is used until I started working on this project. At first it was a bit frustrating to work with them but I have gotten used to them now. So yeah it has been a good learning opportunity :) One more thing, shouldn't it be a `minmum level of warnings.' ? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/src/smooth/ftgrays.c#n441 Thanks, Anuj
