>> > In the end, and this is personal opinion, I find Meson cleaner than
>> > CMake,
I don't have to have a look at Meson to believe this immediately :-)
>> I'd vote for removing CMake support. Its inofficial status means that
>> people shouldn't rely on it anyway, even if there inevitably are
>> people that do.
>>
> I think providing a CMakeLists.txt that can be used directly to compile
> FreeType as a sub-project in a CMake-based project is still a very useful
> thing.
Yes.
> As well as a FindFreeType.cmake or FreeTypeConfig.cmake module to be
> installed to make the system library available.
Yes, too.
> - Meson as the primary build system for FreeType developers, which
> includes the ability to run tests, sanitizers, coverage analysis,
> etc.
It seems that Meson can create cmake package files, and probably build
scripts, too. Wouldn't that be the best solution? I can also imagine
that Meson builds `configure.ac`...
Werner
