> Let's say I want to load the nth font inside a TTC. Would it be
> sufficient to write an SFNT stream starting with the Offset Table
> (and not the TTC Header) along with only those tables that make up
> the nth face?
Yes.
> To put this in context of WOFF2, I want to know whether I should pass
> the SFNT stream of a WOFF2 compressed TTC font with a TTC header and
> *all* its tables, or would it be correct/sufficient to write the
> stream such that the fact that the WOFF2 is actually a collection, is
> hidden from rest of the SFNT processing (they only see the requested
> face in the stream).
A single font from a TTC collection has no references to the TTC as a
whole. So yes, you can completely hide the fact that you are
processing a TTC.
> Do these `individual' streams function identically to a full `TTC'
> stream?
This sentence I don't understand. Please elaborate.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
