> What happened to the resvg (Rust library) idea?
It's not completely off the table, but it seems to me that `svgnative'
is preferable.
> Also, note that the small SVG Native comes at a cost that it doesn't
> support much...
This remark I don't understand. What exactly do you mean with
`doesn't support much'? Please explain. As far as I can see,
`svgnative' will *exactly* cover the SVG stuff allowed in OpenType.
Do we need more?
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
