>> > If a developer believes that she/he needs to change the logger of
>> > a project she/he starts to work with - that's good sign that this
>> > developer has slightly distorted priorities.
>>
>> Well, it is a nice GSoC project IMHO. Not that I would implement it
>> by myself...
>
> Current logging code is perfectly fine IMO, [...]
Good to hear that it satisfies you. However, it is far from perfect,
believe me – I'm the one who mostly works on that.
>> > For instance has anyone heard anything about the logger during
>> > last years GSoC?
>>
>> The idea to add a logger library is just a few months old.
>
> I mean that even if a GSoC student working on adding some
> functionality to Freetype (and who apparently was new to Freetype)
> never complained about the logging functionality then the logging
> code is not a problem at all.
Well, as far as I can see, it's exactly as Armin described the
situation: people insert `printf' statements for debugging. And the
final code usually missed important debugging calls...
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
