On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 9:59 PM Alexei Podtelezhnikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And you broke it. Four of the > harfbuzz/test/shaping/data/text-rendering-tests fail with this. > > I made it more accurate with less rounding error while still > standard-compliant and faster too. > This doesn't sound like rounding-error level of changes: Actual: [A|B@520,0|C@1094,0] Expected: [A|B@584,0|C@1196,0] > I actually appreciate if you don't touch that code. It's been put in > place *very* carefully. > > I would appreciate more constructive and detailed bug report please. See my second reply. > Are there visual artifacts? I would say yes, given the huge difference in numbers. > It would be incorrect to optimize fonts for excessive rounding errors in > earlier FteeType. Are you testing this code? If not, don't touch it. Serious. That function was perfected in over two years... -- behdad http://behdad.org/
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
