> > In addition I wonder if the entire ftdbgmem.c should be reworked > > with size_t instead of FT_Long. > > Using `size_t' makes sense, yes.
I applied the change but decided to stay away from ftdbgmem.c. What is its purpose anyway in the World of valgrind and other tools? Hin-Tak, If you use ftdbgmem.c, please provide further patches. Alexei _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
