On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:09 PM, mayamatakeshi <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Michael Collins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:32 AM, mayamatakeshi >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> About mod_fifo, it would be safe to use it in multi-tenancy scenarios >>> where domains are created and deleted all the time and in consequence, fifos >>> are created all the time? I mean, fifos are eventually destroyed by mod_fifo >>> itself. Is this correct? >>> >>> br, >>> takeshi >>> >>> >> No, FIFOs are not "destroyed" automatically just because the last member >> goes away. Tony says that an empty FIFO takes up almost no memory so >> performance shouldn't be an issue. You can always issue the API command: >> *fifo reparse del_all* to clean everything out if you feel like things >> are getting out of hand. >> > > Thanks, > I have updated the mod_fifo wiki page. > > FYI, I was doing some other research and I noticed this on the mod_fifo wiki page: *fifo_destroy_after_use*: FreeSWITCH automatically create a new FIFO when the first time use it, and keep in the memory hash. This var tell FreeSWITCH destroy it to save memory. Using for a one time FIFO. So... you do have that option as well. -MC
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
