That's really nice looking software. Thanks for the pointer. Cliff
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 16:06 -0400, Gregory Boehnlein wrote: > I'm fond of Vqmanager from ManagEngine. It is a passive SIP monitor. I.E. > you mirror the ports that your FS or Asterisk boxes, and VQmanager sniffs > the mirrors, tracking all sorts of good data. > > You can install it on a Centos box, and get a free trial. > > http://www.manageengine.com/products/vqmanager/index.html > > What is really cool is that it actually monitors the RTP/RTCP as well as all > of the SIP headers and archives the calls, so you can look at calls from > several days ago and see EXACTLY what happened on them. I have used this > extensively to pinpoint bad Level 3 and X/O media gateways.. Much better > than trying to sniff packets in real-time and MAYBE catch a problem.. > > I've also used it to find/fix several SIP issues w/ odd endpoints.. Very > easy to see.. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:freeswitch- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Cliff Wells > > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:52 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity > > > > A little off-topic, but since call-capacity is the subject, what are > > people using to analyze their CDR's to discover this? I'm handling > > about 30k calls per day but have only a bandwidth-based guesstimate of > > the peak number of concurrent calls I'm handling. > > > > If there's an open source solution, I'd appreciate a pointer. > > > > Regards, > > Cliff > > > > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 18:01 -0400, Eliot Gable wrote: > > > Although, FYI, I just benchmarked mod_xml_curl on a separate web app > > > server from FS with FS on a Dell R710 with their current best > > > processor option (Intel Xeon X5570 @2.93GHz with 8-cores total) and > > 32 > > > GB memory. The web app server is less than half the power of the > > R710. > > > I maxed the web app server at 300 calls per second (both setting up > > > and tearing down) and the R710 running FS was 65% idle. No audio was > > > being proxied through FS, though. If I were running the web app > > server > > > on an equivalent R710, they probably would have been on-par with each > > > other in performance. Extrapolating, I expect that in such a case I > > > should be able to get at least 650 CPS out of FS, though for > > > production I would probably limit it to 400 CPS or less so I leave > > > room for miscellaneous tasks. I maxed out the R710 at over 16,000 > > > simultaneous calls (again, no audio proxying) but the only reason I > > > couldn't do more was because I hit some sort of thread creation limit > > > in Linux. There was about 17 GB of memory used for this many calls. > > > This should give you some ballpark idea of what you can accomplish > > > with FS. > > > > > > At some point, I will track down and resolve the thread creation > > > issue, at which time I believe call limits will be limited either by > > a > > > complex combination of available memory, the speed of the processor, > > > the cost of thread context switching, calls per second setup rate, > > and > > > call duration. > > > > > > -- > > > Eliot Gable > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:56 PM > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Estimating Call Capacity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Vinuth Madinur > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here are a few benchmarks that I had stumbled upon. > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.voiceworks.pl/display/~pawel/FreeSwitch+performance+on+SUN+ > > x2200+M2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please remember NO benchmarks are endorsed by the FS community or > > > > > > > > developers, because there are just too many variables, and a simple > > > > > > > > figure is just useful for marketing hype, not for real > > dimensioning. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You MUST do your own benchmarking, so you get an idea about how to > > > > > > > > dimension for your own use case and hardware. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Vinuth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Brian West > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I highly doubt it... You can wait for someone to post their > > results > > > > > > > > >> but in the end you'll have to do your own load testing because > > not > > > > > > > > >> everyone's numbers will jive with your use case. Which is the > > reason > > > > > > > > >> the project never posts or endorses a set call count. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> /b > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Are there any benchmarking test results available publicly? > > > > > > > > >> > ________________________________________ > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > >> > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > > users > > > > > > > > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > > users > > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Giovanni Maruzzelli > > > > > > > > Cell : +39-347-2665618 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > > users > > > > > > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > > users > > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- > > http://www.google.com/search?q=vonage+sucks > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- > > users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by N2Net Mailshield, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org -- http://www.google.com/search?q=vonage+sucks _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
