Dear Freesurfer users and developers,
Yes, sorry... I should have specified this. I meant the mean curvature
('curv' in qdec). And considering that this index is being calculated by
formula: 1/radius - there must be an opposite interpretation (so, not a
flattening actually, but folding?)... How come? Speaking about survivals
after the correction for multiple comparison it is the parahippocampal
area.
---
Kind Regards,
Alex
* Alexander Lebedev <[email protected]> [Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:43:37
+0400]:
> Dear Freesurfer Users!
> Is it wise to interpret the increased curvature index in
> neurodegenerative disorders as a more expressed atrophy (which
manifests
> as a flattening)... I am just doubting because I have never worked
with
> curvature analysis previously and its interpretations in different
> articles look quite controversal... The matter is that in our work the
> observed increase of the curvature index was found in the majority of
> the "thinned" areas...
> Thank you very much beforehand.
> ---
> Regards,
> Alex Lebedev
> Stavanger University Hospital
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
