Hi Tiago, I think the best option is to specify to ipmimonitoring the specific sensors you don't want reported (-R). This is easy if you're scripting something. If you're not, defaults can be configured into /etc/freeipmi/freeipmi.conf so you don't have to type it every time (note that the config would be through ipmi-sensors not ipmimonitoring. ipmimonitoring is a script around ipmi-sensors).
A slightly more advanced option is to try and disable this sensor via ipmi-sensors-config. Advanced sensor configuration can be tricky and motherboards don't always like it/work well with it b/c vendors typically assume the user will never try to change their defaults. This latter option isn't one I recommend for more inexperienced folks. Al On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:16 +0100, Tiago Vasconcelos wrote: > Hi > > I have installed freeipmi 1.2.1 on a Dell PowerEdge R415, where > ipmimonitoring outputs the following Critical state: > > 48 | Processor 2 Presence | Entity Presence | Critical | 'Entity Absent' > > The system is meant to have a single processor. So I don't want ipmi to > complain about the absence of a second processor. > > I have browsed the iDRAC interface but I couldn't find out how I can get > rid of this Critical alert. Does anyone know? > > > Tiago > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipmi-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users -- Albert Chu [email protected] Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
