Thanks Al. It seems that MB sensor flag is invalid. A different system (SR2500) is showing the correct value.
13: Fan 1 (Fan): 6450.00 RPM (1720.00/NA): [OK] 14: Fan 2 (Fan): 7009.00 RPM (1720.00/NA): [OK] 15: Fan 3 (Fan): 6364.00 RPM (1720.00/NA): [OK] 16: Fan 4 (Fan): 6837.00 RPM (1720.00/NA): [OK] 17: Fan 5 (Fan): 9176.00 RPM (2046.00/NA): [OK] 18: Fan 6 (Fan): 8060.00 RPM (2046.00/NA): [OK] 19: PS1 AC Current (Current): 2.60 A (NA/11.90): [OK] Thanks aray > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Chu [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:37 PM > To: Ashish Ray > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-users] Ipmi-sensors threshold values > > Hi Ashish, > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 17:12 -0400, Ashish Ray wrote: > > 14: Fan 2 (Fan): 9030.00 RPM (1720.00/NA): [At or Below (<=) Lower > > Critical Thre shold] > > (Note: 0.3.1 is quite old. I believe my statements are valid for the > 0.3.1 release, but it's a release from quite some time ago, > so maybe the code changed significantly.) > > If I had to bet there, may be a bug on your motherboard. The > "At or below lower critical threshold" comes directly from > the sensor. So if I had to guess: > > A) the 1720 rpm threshold listed by the sensor is invalid. > > B) the sensor indicating the "At or below lower critical > threshold" flag is invalid. > > Any chance you could update your copy FreeIPMI and run w/ > --debug? I can give you additional information if you can. since it is integrated with other software we can't upgrated to newer ver. > > Al > > -- > Albert Chu > [email protected] > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
