Right, forgot to remove autosignature. :) See my post at the bottom of my last email.
Rgds, Siggi On Fri, April 8, 2011 08:38, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: > > mvh, Sigbjorn Lie > > > 's/windows/unix/g' > - "Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me" > > > > On Fri, April 8, 2011 01:03, Kevin Unthank wrote: > >> <snip> >> >> >>>> Just to elaborate on Dmitri's comments. In addition to the IPA client >>>> and server packages that are included in the RHEL6.1 beta channel, there >>>> will be a separate >>>> RHEL add-on channel, Enterprise Identity Replication. >>>> That add-on channel will contain ds-replication and the Windows sync >>>> packages. >>>> >>>> If you wish to use IPA during the beta or when it is a tech preview >>>> feature of RHEL 6.1 you should request an eval entitlement to the >>>> Enterprise Identity >>>> Replication channel from your Red Hat account >>>> rep. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Kev >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Kevin, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have requested the replication channel as you recommended from our >>> account manager. >>> >>> >>> >>> I am curious to why such an important feature as replication is put in it's >>> own channel. I >>> see IPA is trying to compete with Active Directory to service Unix/Linux >>> machines, however >>> with Active Directory all features is included in the base package of the >>> operating system. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why does Red Hat put the replication feature of IPA into a seperate channel >>> from the >>> operating system? >>> >>> >>> Rgds, >>> Siggi >>> >>> >> >> Hi Siggi, >> >> >> >> With RHEL6 we are striving to have more flexibility with packaging and >> features. From the website: http://www.redhat.com/rhel/add-ons/ >> >> "Add-Ons to Red Hat Enterprise Linux allow you to tailor your application >> environment with workload extensions to suit your particular computing >> requirements." >> >> For RHEL6.2 we are planning to have an Enterprise Identity Replication >> add-on. Until then, free evaluations will be available for customers who >> wish to play with IPA >> while it is a technology preview. >> > > Hi Kevin, > > > Please disregards Steven Jones' ranting, this was not the kind of feedback I > was looking for. > > > Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to > my next question: > Will there be an extra charge for this add on channel, or will this be > included in the base > subscription? > > If $answer = yes { Why does Red Hat think they can charge more for a feature > that is included in > it's competitors base license for the equivalent product? } > > Else if $answer = no { Great! :) } > > > > > Rgds, > Siggi > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipa-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users > > _______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
