> On 2 Aug 2024, at 13:18, Florence Blanc-Renaud via FreeIPA-users 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 4:53 PM Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via 
> FreeIPA-users <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> >> On 18 Jul 2024, at 22:15, Rob Crittenden <[email protected] 
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> I am a bit lost here. Shouldn’t adding these privileges be enough to
>> >> create users? And if the user is added to the admin group, shouldn’t
>> >> users it creates via ldap (not ipa user-add) be modifiable by another
>> >> admin user? 
>> > 
>> > There isn't enough information to go on. Can you show us more details on
>> > this Keycloak privilege and permissions and what these unmodifiable
>> > users look like?
>> > 
>> > rob
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> Ok, here’s a full report:
>> 
>> I created a user called “biding”. I then created a role so that this user 
>> could add other users and could be used on Keycloak for binding and adding 
>> users.
>> 
>> I gave it the following default roles: 
>> 
>> - User administration
>> - helpdesk
>> - Keycloak biding (sorry for the typo)
>> 
>> The last one is like this: 
>> 
>> ✘ ⚡ root@freeipa  /home/francis  ipa privilege-show
>> Privilege name: Keycloak admin
>>  Privilege name: Keycloak admin
>>  Permissions: System: Add Users, System: Change User password
>>  Granting privilege to roles: Keycloak biding
>> ⚡ root@freeipa  /home/francis  ipa role-show
>> Role name: Keycloak biding
>>  Role name: Keycloak biding
>>  Member users: biding
>>  Privileges: User Administrators, Group Administrators, Stage User 
>> Administrators, Stage User Provisioning,
>>              Modify Users and Reset passwords, Modify Group membership, 
>> Keycloak admin
>> 
>> 
>> I can’t add a user with it on Keyclok. This is what I get on the logs:
>> 
>> { "date": "[19\/Jul\/2024:14:31:59.636888234 +0200] ", "utc_time": 
>> "1721392319.636888234", "event": "AUTHZ_ERROR", "dn": 
>> "uid=biding,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=med-lo", "bind_method": "SIMPLE", 
>> "root_dn": false, "client_ip": "10.10.210.152", "server_ip": "10.10.40.20", 
>> "ldap_version": 3, "conn_id": 3722, "op_id": 1, "msg": 
>> "target_dn=(uid=testing2,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=med-lo)” }
>> 
>> I then added “biding” to the “admins” group.
>> 
>> I could then create users on keycloak with it. This is how a user looks like:
>> 
>> testing, users, accounts, ipa.med-lo
>> dn: uid=testing,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=ipa,dc=med-lo
>> sn: TEst
>> givenName: Test
>> mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> cn: Test TEst
>> uid: testing
>> objectClass: top
>> objectClass: inetOrgPerson
>> objectClass: organizationalPerson
>> objectClass: person
>> objectClass: postfixMailBox
>> objectClass: ipaobject
>> ipaUniqueID: b203edc0-45c9-11ef-bb0c-00505695d7f7
>> 
>> But, when searching for this user with my read-only system account, it 
>> doesn’t get it: 
>> 
>> ldapsearch -b dc=ipa,dc=med-lo -D 
>> uid=system,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=ipa,dc=med-lo -W uid=testing
>> Enter LDAP Password:
>> # extended LDIF
>> #
>> # LDAPv3
>> # base <dc=ipa,dc=med-lo> with scope subtree
>> # filter: uid=testing
>> # requesting: ALL
>> #
>> 
>> # search result
>> search: 2
>> result: 0 Success
>> 
>> # numResponses: 1
>> 
>> So I have two problems:
>> 
>> How to give “biding” permission to add and modify users without adding it to 
>> the “admins” group, and how to make the users created by it readable like a 
>> normal ipa-user?
> IPA assumes that it manages posix users, i.e. users with posixaccount 
> objectclass. Most of the ACIs are written with this assumption (targetfilter 
> = "(objectclass=posixaccount)").
> If you create your users with this objectclass I believe user management will 
> be easier and you can rely on the existing role "User Administrator".
> 
> flo
>> 

I tried that today. The problem is that if the user is created by Keycloak, 
than I need to send all the attributes a posixAccount requires, such as 
uidNumber and gidNumber. Keycloak can’t create those by default, which makes it 
a bit harder to delegate user creation to Keycloak.

Any tips on a possible workaround?

Best,
Francis

-- 
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
  • [Freeipa-users] How does... Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via FreeIPA-users
    • [Freeipa-users] Re:... Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-users
      • [Freeipa-users]... Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via FreeIPA-users
        • [Freeipa-us... Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-users
          • [Freeip... Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via FreeIPA-users
            • [F... Florence Blanc-Renaud via FreeIPA-users
              • ... Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via FreeIPA-users
              • ... Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via FreeIPA-users
                • ... Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via FreeIPA-users
                • ... Florence Blanc-Renaud via FreeIPA-users

Reply via email to