Finn Fysj via FreeIPA-users wrote: >> Finn Fysj via FreeIPA-users wrote: >> >> It has to do with where ACIs live in the tree. If all ACIs live in the >> basedn then for every single operation, all ACIs will be evaluated. This >> is slow. >> >> We try to locate ACIs within the "container" for each object instead of >> globally (e.g. cn=users,cn=accounts). This applies the user-specific >> ACIs only when user objects are managed. >> >> I don't know about old and new with subtree and type. From what I >> remember this has always been available on the cli from my initial >> implementation. The type (user,group,host,etc) is shorthand for where >> the ACI will be placed so that user's don't need to understand the tree >> layout. Subtree is a more manual approach to this to provide flexibility. >> >> As I said, I can't believe that a global aci granting access to >> member/memberof would affect HBAC evaluation. HBAC doesn't bind as >> anonymous so these shouldn't even apply. >> >> rob > > Hmm... Alright. > > I appreciate your time and effort, Rob.
Sure. One more thing. By granting at the base instead of each container, this effectively gives anonymous the right to read member/memberof of EVERY entry in IPA. Probably not what you wanted anyhow. e.g. anonymous could ask "who can run sudo?" rob _______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
