On 04/03/2023 17:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
you'll see no error. However if you just do thisdiff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi index 0733c2f4f3798..829fbe05b5713 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi @@ -1094,8 +1094,7 @@ mdp5_intf1_out: endpoint { }; dsi0: dsi@1a98000 { - compatible = "qcom,msm8916-dsi-ctrl", - "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl"; + compatible = "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl"; reg = <0x01a98000 0x25c>; reg-names = "dsi_ctrl"; and run the same test you getYes, correct. It's valid but it's deprecated, so the bindings are sane. Keep in mind there's an ABI-like aspect to this. Konrad
The _driver_ will still accept "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl" which is ABI compliant but, I don't see why the yaml should.
If you declare a new .dts with only "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl", that should throw a yaml check error.
--- bod
