On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 09:44:17PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> There is only one platform, which needs special care in the reset
> function, the SDM845. Add special handler for sdm845 and drop the
> qcom_smmu500_reset() function.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 34 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index c3bcd6eb2f42..75bc770ccf8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -361,6 +361,8 @@ static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct
> arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> +
> /*
> * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
> * such as USB and UFS, turn off wait-for-safe on sdm845 based boards,
> @@ -374,23 +376,20 @@ static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct
> arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> -{
> - const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
> -
> - arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> -
> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500"))
> - return qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(smmu);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_impl = {
> .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> - .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> + .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> + .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> + .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct arm_smmu_impl sdm845_smmu_500_impl = {
> + .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> + .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> + .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> + .reset = qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset,
> .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> };
> @@ -398,7 +397,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_impl = {
> static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_impl = {
> .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> - .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> + .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> .alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
> .write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> @@ -450,6 +449,11 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_data
> = {
> .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_impl,
> };
>
> +static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
> + .impl = &sdm845_smmu_500_impl,
> + /* No adreno impl, on sdm845 it is handled by separete sdm845-smmu-v2.
> */
separete -> separate
Also, while I'm here, does "No adreno impl" constitute adding a
compatible in the driver?
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", .data = &msm8996_smmu_data },
> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> @@ -460,7 +464,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused
> qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> - { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", .data = &sdm845_smmu_500_data },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_data },
> --
> 2.35.1
>
