Then I had to correct something I sent...

> On Nov 5, 2025, at 7:26 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> I replied to both...
> 
>> On Nov 5, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Anyone willing to respond to the following Gitlab issue?
>> 
>> https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/issue-reporting/-/issues/75
>> 
>> For those without permission to read it, user [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]> reported:
>> 
>>> I had to reinstall Windows to fix the issue
>>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025, 8:36 pm WILLIAM MACKIE, [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>> I tried to install the USB full version and it just bricked my Acer you 
>>>> have to fix the bug because the USB full version also has numerous amounts 
>>>> of errors when it comes to booting the setup
>> 
>> No further details given...
>> 
> 
> It is unfortunate you had a bad experience installing FreeDOS. We will need 
> more information than you have provided to attempt to remedy any issues with 
> OS or its installation. What "bug" are referring to, when does it occur, what 
> should it do and what does it actually do? 
> 
> You also mention errors booting the setup. Are you referring to the booting 
> the install media or the booting the installed FreeDOS from the hard drive. 
> What are the errors you received? Without some additional information we will 
> be unable to assist or fix any of the issues you mentioned.  
> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Another one:
>> 
>> https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/issue-reporting/-/issues/74
>> 
>> Joshua Hudson wrote on this:
>> 
>>> I encountered what looks like packaging error on the FreeDOS Lite USB 
>>> distribution
>>> For some reason, FREEDOS\BIN has a ZIP.EXE but not an UNZIP.EXE. This makes 
>>> it really hard to restore a single missing or damaged file. Note that 
>>> ZIP.EXE can't unzip archives.
>>> It would make a lot more sense if it had UNZIP.EXE but not ZIP.EXE but I 
>>> don't think space is that much of an issue that it can't just have both. 
>>> I'm guessing ZIP is there for a reason.
>> 
>> In my opinion he is right on this. If there is a ZIP, there should also be 
>> an UNZIP.
>> 
>> Bernd
>> 
> 
> Unlike the Large USB and LiveCD, only FreeDOS BASE and programs required by 
> the installer are present on the LITE USB image. Neither ZIP nor UNZIP are 
> part of FreeDOS BASE. ZIP is only present on the LITE USB because when the 
> installer is run in advanced mode, it has the option to create a compressed 
> ZIP backup of any existing DOS system files before installing FreeDOS. 
> However, I agree that it could be useful in recovering files from such a 
> compressed backup. So, it is possible a version of UNZIP may be included on 
> the LITE USB in the future.

I misspoke in my previous reply... Actually, ZIP and UNZIP are installed with 
FreeDOS BASE. But only packages which may be needed by the installer are 
extracted on the LITE USB. ZIP's executable is present because it can be used 
by the installer. UNZIP is not used by the installer. 

> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freedos-devel mailing list
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel>
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to