I think that can be done right? If we are finished with 1.2, then we (or
some of us) can make it. Unless, nobody wants to do such thing. So, yeah I
am volunteering. but it still needs an under layer right (for running
programs)?
Maarten
--
2016-06-15 9:23 GMT+02:00 Eric Auer <[email protected]>:
>
> >From Ben Hutchinson <[email protected]>
>
> By minimal, I mean that the boot sector program, and the kernel
> (kernel.sys), don't do any displaying of text. All they need to do is
> set up the DOS interrupt vectors (so that they behave correctly just as
> with MS-DOS), and then load and execute the first file, command.com. No
> displaying text at all. The screen should remain blank until something
> in command.com causes text or graphics to display. Such an absolute
> minimal version of FreeDOS would be useful for me, because it would
> allow me to write my own program in assembly language, call it
> command.com, and then copy that file to the disk, and use it to boot
> another computer directly into the software I've written. This minimal
> version of FreeDOS would be just a boot-loader for my own OS-level
> software, a launch-point for my application (my application existing in
> place of an OS, rather than being run from an OS), that would then run
> upon booting.
>
>
Project founder and developer of BirdOS by FeatherCode
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=1444514421&iu=/41014381
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
