Correction... FreeDOS 1.2. Not 2.0. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Antony Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > If I were building the FreeDOS distribution, the only thing that would be > included as a part of the official FreeDOS install would be the components > that make up the OS depending on the MS/PC DOS version distribution we > wanted to emulate. > > I would also supply these files as one complete ZIP file instead of > individual files as they make up the core of what you expect to have > available when using DOS. I think that is all the FreeDOS installer should > install. Everything else should be separate. > > All the other stuff would be fluff, like GEM, NDN, and the developer tools. > > If the final line in the sand is that without source it can’t be included, > I think a list of where to find stuff would be useful to find the tools or > applications needed. > > On May 28, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Mercury Thirteen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Although it is freeware, source code for NDN appears to be unavailable. > Given this project's push towards 100% open software, I am inclined to > exclude it from the FreeDOS 2.0 image. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Freedos-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
