Hi,
Not only about kernels, but about the 16-bit DOS compiling options too.
I think we talked about this in the past, and I think it'd make sense that
FreeDOS 2.0 would be 386+.
Aitor
2015-01-01 23:43 GMT+01:00 Mercury Thirteen <[email protected]>:
> Speaking of multiple kernels, would it be acceptable to require a minimum
> hardware platform for a new version of FreeDOS? Could we exclude the
> pre-386 crowd without backlash? Personally, I think that's acceptable and
> I'm sure Microsoft would've no doubt done the same thing by now had they
> not gone to Windows. There's no way they would still include the 8086 and
> 80186 in their modern MS-DOS, had they made one.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
