Hi! > I'm quite surprised to notice that on average, the binaries produced by > OW are twice as big as the same code compiled using Turbo C.
Have you tried the usual stuff, such as avoiding heavier constructs like file streams and printf formatters? There might be some lighter alternative C libraries for OW as well, but I remember that the FreeDOS kernel size is not bad with OW - have a look at which compile switches that uses and which library functions it avoids ;-) Note that 16 vs 32 bit compile may make a big difference. Cheers, Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
