I could see multithreading support in 7-zip.

but then again files aren't usually very big in DOS.  I don't know if 
OpenWATCOM or DJGPP has support for POSIX threads.
C++ is getting a makeover by the way, it is getting native STL support for 
threads if I understand correctly.  I should double-check the specs for TR1 and 
TR2 to see if it's in those places, or if it's in the language spec.  If 
nothing else, GCC is getting a makeover.




>________________________________
>From: Eric Auer <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2011 12:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Freedos and lack of drivers
>
>
>Hi :-)
>
>> In fact , i running arachne with older pcmcia 11 mb drivers for wifi, BUT  i
>> can't use new pcmcia card wifi 
>> up to 54 and more MB ..
>
>Wireless is a pain in DOS, yes, sorry.
>
>> Impossible also using wifi pen
>
>See above, unfortunately. But some network cable.
>
>> or usb external device like printers /
>
>Georg / Bret drivers should work. If your printer
>still does not work then, it is probably cheapo GDI
>but slightly better printers accept PostScript or
>PDF - hopefully also good old plain text. Even for
>GDI it might be possible to convert your print data
>to something that the printer can use under DOS :-)
>
>
>
>> scanners or bluetooth...
>
>People still use scanners? I thought they used their
>photocamera, then even the BIOS often supports your
>SD cardreader in DOS without any drivers... ;-) As
>for bluetooth, what apart from mobile phone headsets
>uses that at the moment? I guess it could also be
>used for wireless data transfer to mobile phones or
>printers, but luckily both also have USB ports :-)
>
>
>
>> How many time we can continue use dos with OLDER hardware?
>
>DOS runs fine on my very modern hardware, thank you.
>Even Linux boots in a fraction of a minute, not one
>hour as dos386 suggests. DOS works great supporting
>my parallel printer, floppy, SATA DVD drive etc but
>you are right that USB3 drivers are not freeware in
>DOS and no drivers for hardware-accelerated FullHD
>movie playback with surround sound over HDMI exist:
>
>
>
>In short, DOS does not NEED new hardware... But then,
>I do not think we want to follow the Windows example
>where people are actually worried that 2 GB will not
>be enough RAM to write a letter in MS Office... ;-)
>
>I mean when your DOS EMM64 will support 16 GB of RAM,
>where do you find DOS software needing that? Maybe a
>Commander Keen with support for holographic screens?
>
>Would be cool, I guess. And would need multi CPU and
>SLI accel graphics and NCQ, which all *are* not DOS.
>
>Eric
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the 
>Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the 
>threat from malware and how it can impact your online business. 
>http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427462/
>_______________________________________________
>Freedos-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the 
Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the 
threat from malware and how it can impact your online business. 
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427462/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to