Hi Christian, > Well, decent MS-DOS kernels plus command interpreters > also have LBA, FAT32 and DOSLFN support.
That is Windows 98 DOS... Better kernel but fewer apps... And if you buy it, you get a Windows that you do not need if you only wanted DOS as unwanted extra... ;-). > Is it? I'm still waiting for one of us both to apply the > latest patches regarding SFTs, file seeks and self- > owning PSP termination to the DOS-C SVN. And I still wait for some more life in the thread where I tried to discuss several other pending patches. It would be nicer to have some community activity again here... What do you think about my new wiki page about 2037 code? >> In addition, I have no compatibility problems with >> FreeDOS that would motivate me to use another DOS instead. > > I don't "use" MS-DOS to actually use it, but to debug it and therefore > increase the compatibility of FreeDOS, or EDR-DOS, or RxDOS. I get your point but still... I stopped using MS DOS about seven years ago when FreeDOS became useful enough for me. This certainly included some "fandom" because back then it was still a bit minimalistic compared to MS DOS / Win98 DOS. Tastes differ :-). Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
