Hi all, wouldn't be better porting dillo for freedos? imho, the main bottleneck is the gui part that should be re written
http://www.dillo.org/ See Ya, Geraldo Sapere Aude Non ducor, duco São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt site: http://exdev.sf.net/ msn: geraldo_boca_at_hotmail.com skype: geraldo-netto icq: 145-061-456 2009/3/29 Eric Auer <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > >>>> - As I think xswap will not work in native Linux >>> You will not need any of that if you simply compile Arachne >>> with a 32bit compiler in the first place. >> >> Why it can't be also simple compiled on DOS with 32 bit compiler? > > That is what I meant - port Arachne to GNU C / DJGPP and > then you have better performance in DOS - and an easier > life in porting to Linux. Two good things for one effort. > >>>> - Dr WebSpyder and Lineo Embrowser (unfortunately no source code) >>>> ported to Allegro and gave Arachne a speed boost. >>> Arachne has GPL license so you can force WebSpyder/Lineo to >>> make their Arachne modifications public. >> >> No, them have purchased a proprietary license from the copyright holders >> (original developers). GPL doesn't surrender rights. It's dual licensing >> like with Qt. > > Oh I understand. That is bad luck for fans then, fans > will have to port Arachne to Allegro a second time if > they want a free open source Allegro based Arachne... > > Eric > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
