On 10/26/07, Johnson Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO, a smaller, solid and flexable kernel is highest priority.
stability is most important of course. > Kernel grows bigger each release ??? Where have you been? Any numbers to back it up? Or were you looking at the sizes of the source .zips, which of course grow because the changelog grows :) In my parallel universe a similarly featured (uncompressed) kernel went from around 80K to about 64K between 2000 and 2004, and after that there hasn't been much change -- well except from the time that there has been *too much* aiming at size reduction -- those changes are so big that now nobody has time to check them, see the 2037 "UNSTABLE" experiment. Bart ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
